The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is moving to eliminate cybersecurity rules that have long governed telecommunications carriers, a controversial step that experts warn could weaken the cyber defense posture of one of America’s most critical infrastructure sectors. Commissioner Brendan Carr has argued that the existing regulations are outdated and burdensome to private carriers, while security professionals fear that eliminating oversight could open new avenues for attackers targeting national communications systems.
The stakes are high. Telecommunications carriers form the backbone of the nation’s connectivity, supporting emergency services, financial systems, and cloud infrastructure. Without strong cybersecurity compliance and oversight, the entire ecosystem becomes more vulnerable to advanced threats, misconfigurations, and CVE exploitation.
Why the FCC’s Cybersecurity Rules Matter
For years, the FCC’s cybersecurity framework for telecommunications providers has required companies to implement baseline protections, report breaches, and ensure transparency when handling sensitive customer data. These measures included risk assessments, incident response planning, and participation in threat-sharing initiatives with federal agencies.
The removal of these rules means carriers would no longer be obligated to report cybersecurity incidents directly to the FCC or maintain compliance with specific baseline security standards. Instead, carriers would be left to self-manage their cybersecurity programs - a model that, while efficient for operations, carries significant risk for national resilience.
Potential Implications for the Telecommunications Sector
The proposed rollback introduces several high-impact risks:
-
Reduced Accountability
Without clear regulatory oversight, smaller or mid-sized carriers may deprioritize cybersecurity investments, viewing them as optional expenses rather than national obligations. -
Increased Attack Surface
Telecom networks handle massive amounts of data, often traversing legacy routing systems and unpatched hardware. Without strict compliance oversight, these environments could remain vulnerable to known CVEs affecting routers, switches, and communication endpoints. -
Delayed Incident Reporting
If carriers are not required to report breaches to federal authorities, national security agencies could lose valuable early-warning data. Attack campaigns that begin in smaller carriers could go undetected until they spread to large-scale infrastructure. -
Greater Risk of Supply Chain Exploits
Telecom providers rely on third-party vendors for network hardware, firmware, and cloud integrations. Without regulatory checks, insecure vendor products could introduce backdoors, trojans, or unpatched vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit at scale.
CVE and Exploitation Risks in Telecom Environments
Telecommunications infrastructure is a prime target for attackers exploiting known vulnerabilities. Many CVEs that affect routers, baseband equipment, and management software can be used to disrupt communications or intercept data. Examples include:
-
Remote code execution vulnerabilities in network management systems that allow unauthorized access to core routers.
-
Firmware CVEs that enable attackers to bypass authentication on telecom-grade switches and gain control of data flows.
-
Privilege escalation flaws in monitoring consoles that grant administrative access across multi-tenant carrier environments.
Without mandated patch cycles or CVE disclosure processes, attackers can exploit un-remediated flaws for months or even years. This problem is compounded by the long service life of telecom equipment, where legacy devices often remain in operation long after vendor support ends.
How Threat Actors Could Exploit the Regulatory Gap
Adversaries, including state-sponsored groups, view telecommunications networks as strategic assets. The removal of regulatory oversight offers them more time and opportunity to probe for weaknesses. Likely exploitation tactics include:
-
Persistent scanning for unpatched routers and misconfigured BGP sessions to inject malicious routing paths.
-
Exploitation of outdated firmware containing known CVEs in base station controllers or voice-over-IP gateways.
-
Credential theft from management consoles using phishing and brute-force campaigns.
-
Supply chain compromise targeting firmware updates and third-party components.
-
Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks on carrier-level DNS and signaling networks to disrupt communications across entire regions.
Each of these attack vectors underscores the need for continued vigilance and proactive defense, even in the absence of mandated rules.
The Role of Penetration Testing in a Deregulated Environment
With fewer federal requirements, telecom carriers must assume greater responsibility for validating their own defenses. Penetration testing and red team exercises are vital for uncovering hidden vulnerabilities and testing incident response readiness.
Key penetration testing actions for telecommunications organizations include:
-
Assessing network segmentation to ensure that administrative systems and customer-facing infrastructure are isolated.
-
Testing for unpatched CVEs in routers, firmware, and network operating systems.
-
Simulating DDoS and signaling attacks to evaluate network resilience and response efficiency.
-
Performing social engineering assessments to identify weak employee training or phishing susceptibility.
-
Conducting supply chain security reviews to validate vendor patch management and firmware integrity.
Incorporating these tests regularly helps telecom operators maintain visibility into their true security posture and reduces reliance on external mandates.
Defensive Strategies for Telecom Carriers
In light of deregulation, telecommunications companies can strengthen cybersecurity resilience through several practical measures:
-
Implement a Continuous Vulnerability Management Program
Track, prioritize, and patch all known CVEs across critical network components. Use automated scanners and maintain a rolling 30-day patch window for high-severity vulnerabilities. -
Adopt Zero Trust Architecture
Implement strict identity controls, segment network management zones, and enforce authentication across every access point. -
Enhance Threat Intelligence Sharing
Even if reporting to the FCC becomes optional, carriers should voluntarily share indicators of compromise with national cyber agencies and trusted ISACs. -
Conduct Regular Penetration Testing
Simulate real-world attacks to validate network defenses, supply chain resilience, and incident response capabilities. -
Strengthen Incident Response Programs
Maintain well-documented playbooks that include escalation procedures, communication templates, and containment strategies. -
Invest in Network Monitoring and Anomaly Detection
Use AI-driven network visibility tools to identify abnormal routing changes, data exfiltration, or control channel manipulation.
Why Policy and Security Must Align
Regulations may evolve, but the fundamental truth remains unchanged: telecommunications networks are critical national infrastructure. Deregulation can foster innovation and efficiency, but it can also create gaps that cybercriminals and nation-state actors are eager to exploit. A balanced approach that encourages operational flexibility while maintaining baseline cybersecurity obligations is essential.
Final Thought - Cybersecurity Is National Security
The FCC’s rollback of cybersecurity rules highlights a broader tension between regulatory simplification and national defense. Telecommunications carriers are now at a crossroads - they can either view cybersecurity as compliance overhead or embrace it as a core part of their business continuity strategy.
In a landscape filled with evolving CVEs, ransomware campaigns, and supply chain intrusions, self-regulation must be accompanied by discipline, transparency, and proactive defense. Penetration testing, continuous patching, and zero trust adoption are no longer just technical best practices - they are national imperatives.
